President George W. Bush's approval rating has been under 40% for quite some time now. This is not a good sign for Bush or for the Republican's in the next election. However, if you look at all the Presidents since Truman, each one -- with the notable exception of Dwight Eisenhower -- has spent at least part of their term with a rating near 40%. The one thing that is interesting about W however is the fact that since 9/11 he has been on a very steady downward slide. Thank you to the Wall Street Journal for the interesting analysis. (Hat Tip: Barry Ritholtz) Click the photo to enlarge.
So who is lining up to replace W? For the Donkeys Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are in a dead heat on InTrade, the political futures trading website:
For the Elephants it looks like Rudy Giuliani and late entrant Fred Thompson are racing neck in neck:

Actor and former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson hasn't yet announced his campaign for President, but that hasn't stopped him from quickly becoming the early Republican leader in the InTrade prediction markets. In just three months of trading he has passed McCain, Romney and Guiliani in rapid succession:

You can see his rise has been fairly steady and received quite a boost after asking to be released from Law & Order in May and forming an "exploratory committee" in June:

To be perfectly honest I don't know much about Fred's economic policies, though from a quick glance at his blog it looks like he is strong fiscal conservative. All I knew about him before that little bit of research was his stellar performance as Jim Robinson in the "Barbarians at the Gate" made for TV movie . . . but I digress . . .
The ability of markets to process large volumes of pricing information is indisputable. So while polling is still the method of choice for predicting voter behavior, prediction markets, by letting voters put their money where their mouth is, may be a more efficient and continuous means of predicting our next president. With that in mind I scoured the existing prediction markets that allow real money trading -- Iowa Electronic Markets and InTrade -- as well as those that only use play money -- News Futures and Prediction Xchange (currently offline) -- for information on who our next president will be.
In case you are wondering I feel that InTrade is perhaps the best prediction market site because of its easy navigation and advanced graphing capabilities. I am not endorsing that you engage in betting on any of these sites, and if you want to learn more about the potential legal consequences of doing so you should check out this article from Slate.
The electronic prediction markets pose a question, for example "Will Hillary Clinton be the 2008 Democratic Nominee for President?" If Hillary wins the contract is worth $100, if she loses it is worth $0. So logically the more likely she is to win the more someone will pay for the contract and the higher the contract will be worth. Let's start with the real money sites:
- Iowa Electronic Markets (IEM) - IEM is predicting Hillary Clinton will be our next President. More money is riding on a Democratic victory 53.3 over a Republican victory 46. The candidate voting has had an interesting month. On the democratic side Hillary Clinton 40.8 and Barack Obama 40.5 opened the month in a dead heat, with Edwards 7.7 a distant third. The catch all for other candidates was at 12. By the end of April Hillary bumped up to 43.9, Barack fell to 32.4, Edwards is at 9 and the others are at 15. Why is Barack falling and others rising? Is the call for an Al Gore candidacy stealing votes from Obama?
- InTrade - InTrade is predicing Hillary Clinton will be our next president. Hillary Clinton has a wide margin over Obama. The current bid price for Hillary is 47 versus 30.5 for Obama. The third candidate is actually Al Gore with 10.5 over John Edwards with 7.2. According to InTrade Al Gore is still a very strong dark horse candidate. This may help us understand the IEM data better. The one weakness of the IEM market is that lack of a separate trade for Al Gore, who is lumped in with all the other Democratic candidates.
- NewsFutures - NewsFutures is predicting Barack Obama will be our next president. Currently Barack Obama is the 46% favorite to be the 2008 Democratic Nominee for President. Hillary Clinton is a close second at 43%. Republicans are dogs (44) to the Democrats (56) in the general election.
So what have we learned? All the sites are predicting a Democratic victory and the two that trade real money are predicting a Hillary Clinton general election victory. It is however up to you how realistic you think this is. If you have information that leads you to believe that there has been a mispricing I encourage you to put money on it.
In the meantime those chartists out there can digest this chart for Barack Obama from InTrade. It looks solid to me as Barack is still way out in front of his moving averages but he may have some resistance in the low 30's.

Here to is the chart for Rudy Guiliani. You can see that Rudy was up on strong volume in February and March but had trouble breaking 40. He is still the leading Republican candidate.
Barack Obama is a legitimate presidential candidate. If this wasn't clear before, it was certainly clear after he announced he had raised $25 million in campaign contributions, putting him just $1 million behind seasoned fundraiser Hillary Clinton. Having the support of hedge fund legends George Soros and Paul Tudor Jones certainly hasn't hurt either. But, until recently Obama hasn't revealed much about his economic policies. To be perfectly honest his entire domestic policy agenda is largely unknown. Even a thorough analysis of speeches, interviews and his congressional voting record reveals very little substance (some information can be obtained from his website.) I feel the Wall Street Journal described it best when they said he is best known for "his biography, his charisma and his early opposition to the Iraq war."
In his defense, Obama's fundraising ability and charisma has meant that he hasn't had to take strong policy positions thus far, and this will undoubtedly work in his favor as he surveys his opposition and his voter base and develops policies that could place him in the oval office. For now, one of the only ways we can evaluate where Obama will land on the political spectrum is to evaluate the economists he has added to his team. Atop his economic team are star Chicago Economist Austan Goolsbee and two Harvard professors who served on Bill Clinton's economic team, Jeff Liebman and David Cutler. At first blush this is an accomplished and experienced team. Because health care is such an important Democratic issue it is not surprising that Obama will lean heavily on Cutler. Cutler's outstanding research background and his political experience make him a crucial part of a team that will have to come up with a health plan that, as Obama pledged, will "have all individuals covered by the end of his first term." Expect more information on Obama's policies to emerge in the weeks ahead. The first Democratic debate is this Thursday evening.
Below is more detail on the team (click to enlarge):

Disclaimer
The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) who may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.