Country P/E Ratios and GDP Growth

Here is a telling chart courtesy of Bespoke. This ratio makes Sweden look expensive relative to China . . . who would have thought?

Emerging Market ETF Options

Vanguard's Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is beatings its iShares rival (EEM) by 3.18% YTD. Vanguard's VWO is up 23.87% on the year, the MSCI EM Index is up 22.31% and EEM is up 20.89%. Since both funds supposedly track the same index -- the MSCI Emerging Markets Free index -- the high tracking error is bad news for both companies, but is particularly bad for iShares as investors typically are more accomodative if the tracking error leaves them ahead. The Vanguard fund has one other advantage, its expense ratio is 0.30% vs. 0.75% for the iShares fund. But, in spite of these apparent advantages the iShares fund is still 9.5 times larger than the Vanguard fund, proving once again that it is notoriously hard for ETF providers to make up ground on the market leader. We were early adopters of the iShares EEM ETF but are currently looking at VWO as a viable alternative.

The source of the difference may well be the allocation of each ETF to each emerging market country. If you look at the Vanguard fund you will notice that it has slightly more exposure to India, Russia, Brazil, Taiwan and South Korea and less exposure to Mexico, South Africa and China.


While I don't think that the VWO outperformance will necessarily persist, its low expense ratio is attractive. The iShares fund has to beat Vanguard's VWO by 45 basis points a year in order to overcome the difference. That alone may be a good reason for the switch. Since we usually supplement our MSCI EM exposure with country specific ETF's the specific country allocations become less important and the need to obtain cheap beta more important.