Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Markets, Obama Stumble

The Nasdaq is down over 17% since its peak. The S&P 500 is off over 15%. The Dow is off almost 12%. A few more rough days and we'll be treading in a bear market for US equities. As the economy cools due to the housing recession and credit crunch, and as earnings continue their slow it is inevitable that this will be priced in to equities.

The true question is the extent to which you believe that equities are overpriced at their current valuations and just how long and severe this slowdown will be. A secondary level of evaluation needs to be done to determine whether or not you think the US slowdown will be enough to lead to a general recoupling around the world that will slow growth in developed and emerging markets. If you are Nouriel Roubini these are easy questions, but if you aren't, these are questions you should be pondering.

On another note, though it is a little too early to call (13% precincts reporting) it looks as though Hillary Clinton might just mount a stunning rally to take New Hampshire and keep her hopes alive to take the Presidency in 2009. If Hillary had lost New Hampshire she would have been effectively out of the race as many in the Democratic party would have jumped ship. Those hoping for easy sailing for Obama need to take a deep breath. Republicans hoping to face a "beatable" Hillary in the general election just let out a huge sigh of relief.

On the other side of the aisle McCain secured a victory in New Hampshire by a solid 37%-28% margin over Romney. If I were a betting man I would guess that a Romney-Obama general election could be in the works.

Equity Select Portfolio Changes

I made some major changes to the Equity Select Portfolio over the weekend and am in the process of updating the trades in the system to reflect the changes.

As of this yesterday three of my positions - Goldman Sachs, BHP Billiton, Affiliated Managers Group - have been liquidated and replaced. Later this week I will write a full post about what prompted the changes and update everyone on the current performance of the ESP and the Hedged ESP.

Monday, January 7, 2008

How Many Transistors Can you Fit in Your Dot?

It may be because I don't follow Intel too closely but I was surprised that I didn't know that Intel had already rolled out a chip based on the next generation 45-nanometer manufacturing process. You can almost see the smile behind the mask of this Intel engineer holding a 45-nm wafer that has roughly 1.9 billion transistors (do you think he double checked that count just to make sure?). Intel is planning to spend $8 billion to upgrade factories to design the chips.

Just last week I wrote a blog post showing how a gig
just isn't what it used to be. In that same post I wrote that it could be 15-20 years before transistors reach the size of atoms. Now Intel is saying they'll have 32-nanometer chips in production in 2009. To be sure the transistors on a 32-nm fab are not the size of atoms. But just how big are they? Stacy over at GigaOm breaks it down for us:

The different nodes measure the size of the chips, with the 32-nanometer node containing 4 million transistors in a dot the size of a period.
Okay so if the number of transistors on an integrated circuit doubles every 2 years we have the following 15 year schedule starting in 2008:

Year 1: 2009 - 4 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 3: 2011 - 8 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 5: 2013 - 16 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 7: 2015 - 32 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 9: 2017 - 64 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 11: 2019 - 128 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 13: 2021 - 256 million transistors in a dot the size of a period
Year 15: 2023 - 512 million transistors in a dot the size of a period

So in fifteen years Intel should be squeezing 512 million transistors into a dot the size of a period? That sounds like a lot, but is it approaching the size of an atom?
I'm not all too familiar with atoms, but it seems the diameter of an atom is around 10-8 cm. This doesn't mean much to me as I'm sure it doesn't to you, so here are some comparisons I found on to make this problem a little easier to grasp:
  • "An atom is a million times smaller than the thickest human hair."
  • "Take a piece of spaghetti and divided it 12 times. That comes out to be 4,096 pieces of spaghetti. If you were to divide each of those pieces 30 more times that would be about the size of an atom."
  • "If an atom were the size of a period, a person would have to be over 1000 miles tall."
  • "A single carat diamond with a mass of 0.2 g contains about 10 sextillion (1022) atoms of carbon."
Okay I give up, my brain just wasn't mean to understand atoms. Maybe one of my smart readers can tell me if 512 million transistors in the size of a period is getting close to the atomic level? I for one would love to know . . .

Sunday, January 6, 2008

Obama and Clinton Switch Places on Intrade

Barack Obama has had a great start to 2008. He won the Iowa primary and performed well in the New Hampshire debates. To top it off investors have bid up his stock on Intrade. In fact, for the first time in the Presidential race Obama is trading above Hillary Clinton. Going into 2008 Clinton was trading around 70 and Obama around 20. As of right now Obama is trading at 55, and Clinton is around 41 (it looks like Byron Wien is off to a good start):


Obama's strong victory in Iowa surprised a lot of people. One possible explanation for Obama coming out of the gate so strong is the importance of the youth vote. If you visit Facebook's US Politics page you can track which candidates Facebook users support:


The current data does nothing to refute the notion that Barack holds a lot of weight with young voters. Once you break down the data even further it gets really interesting: Keep in mind the Facebook demographic is younger and a full two thirds of all Facebook members who have backed a candidate publicly have backed Democrats. The highest current vote getter is Barack Obama who has 39% of all votes. The second highest vote getter is Ron Paul with 13% of all vote getters. Ron Paul is followed closely by Hillary Clinton with 12% of the vote. Here is a more detailed demographic breakdown for the Democrats:

Barack Obama is strong with the youth crowd and Hillary is strong with the older crowd and with women. Nothing too surprising there.

Here's the breakdown for the Republicans:



Ron Paul is incredibly popular with males and with independents.

And finally Barack will probably fare well in New Hampshire if his sweep of the youth vote continues. Below is his Facebook support in New Hampshire (55% to Hillary's 16%):
Momentum means a lot for Presidential candidates, but we've seen in the past that winning early doesn't guarantee anything.



Hat Tip: Facebook

Thursday, January 3, 2008

$100 Oil: We've Been Here Before

All this fuss about $100/barrel oil is really just a distraction. Now I can understand if you are arguing that $100/barrel oil is important from a psychological/marketing perspective, but not if you think $100/barrel oil is something new. We are actually still a few percent off of oil's all time inflation-adjusted peak of $102.81 back in 1980. But that is neither here nor there . . .


The real reason that this is an issue is not the oil hit $100, but that this time around there exists the real risk that oil could hit $150 or $200 within the next 5 years. The problem is that China is experiencing double digit GDP growth, and although they are 4 times bigger than the US in terms of population , they only use a third of the oil we use. That will change. Same goes for India . . . and Brazil, and the Middle East, and the rest of Asia . . . I think you get the picture. "Peak Oil" is an often discussed, often misunderstood theory, but the facts are fairly clear: most honest people don't expect to find some huge untapped oil field in the near future. And, as long as demand for oil doesn't decrease dramatically the story for $150/barrel oil is still intact. I'm personally of the belief that demand will soften at these prices and with a general global economic slowdown, but I do think the longer-term story is still intact.


Hat Tip: WSJ

I Never Get Sick of These!


Hat Tip: TBP

Byron Wien's 2008 Surprises

As is customary for this time of year, Byron Wien has issued his annual forecast of the biggest surprises to come.

Wien is Morgan Stanley's former chief strategist who now works for Pequot Capital. He has written his annual list of surprises since 1986. This year he is very bearish, and for good reason!

Here is his look-ahead for 2008:

1. In spite of Federal Reserve easing, and other policy measures, the United States economy suffers its first recession since 2001 as housing starts stay soft and banks are reluctant to lend to anyone where a whiff of risk is apparent. Federal funds drop below 3%. The unemployment rate moves definitively above 5% and consumer spending is lackluster.

2. Standard and Poor's 500 earnings decline year-over-year and the index drops another 10 percent. Energy and materials stocks hold up relatively well in what is viewed as a correction rather than a bear market. Market conditions start to improve during the summer.

3. The dollar strengthens in the first half reaching $1.35 against the euro and weakens in the second exceeding $1.50. The European Central Bank begins an accommodative monetary policy. Foreign investors flock in to buy cheap assets in the U.S. early in the year but the dollar declines later as several countries holding large reserves diversify into other assets.

4. Inflation rises above 5 percent on the Consumer Price Index as higher commodity prices and oil finally begin to have an impact in spite of modest wage increases. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rises to 5 percent. Stagflation becomes a frequent presidential campaign and Op-Ed discussion topic.

5. The price of oil goes down early in the year and up later, sinking to $80 a barrel in the first half as western economies slow and inventories are drawn down, and rising to $115 in the second. Established wells continue to decline in production while China, India and the Middle East increase their consumption.

6. Agricultural commodities remain strong. Corn rises to $6 a bushel and cotton to 85 cents a pound. Gold reaches $1,000 an ounce as disillusionment with paper currencies spreads across Asia.

7. The recession in the United States slows the Chinese economy modestly but its stock market declines sharply. Investors recognize that paying biotechnology stock multiples for highly cyclical companies doesn't make sense. The Chinese revalue the renminbi by another 10 percent to control inflation and as a gesture to foreign governments participating in the Olympic Games who complain that Chinese terms of trade are unfair. Several long distance runners refuse to compete in certain Olympic events because of continuing air pollution problems.

8. The new Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, under the tutelage of Vladimir Putin, becomes more assertive in world affairs. He insists that Russian oil and gas be paid for in rubles and demands a Russian seat at major world conferences. Russia and Brazil stock markets lead the BRICs. The Gulf Cooperation Council markets begin to attract interest among emerging market investors.

9. Infrastructure improvement becomes an important election theme for both parties and construction and engineering stocks rally in anticipation of huge programs beginning after the new President's inauguration. Water becomes a critical problem world-wide and desalination stocks soar.

10. Barack Obama becomes the 44th President in a landslide victory over Mitt Romney. With conditions in Iraq improving, the weak economy becomes the determining issue in voters' minds. They want to make sure that gridlock ends and Congress gets something done for a change. The Democrats end up with 60 Senate seats and a clear majority in the House of Representatives.

Wien added that he believes these surprises, which the consensus would assign only a one-in-three chance of happening, have at least a 50 percent probability of occurring at some point during the year.

Looking back to 2007 you can see that Wien was right on about half of his 10 surprises:

1. The S&P 500 exceeds 1600 surprising even optimistic strategists and investors. The combination of strong earnings, reasonable valuations and excess liquidity throughout the world drives the U.S. market higher. Market volatility increases substantially with the VIX index rising to 20.

2. Secretary of the Treasury Paulson’s trips together with the forthcoming Olympics move China to a more accommodative attitude toward the United States and the West. China revalues the yuan by 10% and eases terms for Western partnerships with Chinese companies.

3. Despite a world-wide economic slowdown, crude oil remains in short supply because of Asian demand and the price per barrel returns to $80. Development of alternative sources of energy and sales of hybrid cars remain disappointing. There is a movement in Congress to encourage the construction of nuclear powered electric utility plants and local resistance seems to be softening as the “green wave” starts to take hold.

4. As the standard of living rises around the world, agricultural commodity prices continue to soar. Corn goes to $5.00 a bushel, wheat to $7.00, soybeans to $9.00 and cotton to $.80 a pound. The volatility of cattle prices also attracts investor attention.

5. S&P 500 earnings grow by more than 10% for another year, exceeding analysts’ estimates. Profit margins hold their own as productivity continues to improve.

6. The Federal Reserve does not lower rates in the spring. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield goes to 5.5% as higher wages cause inflationary pressures to increase and the yield curve turns positive. Real growth in the U.S. approaches 3% once again as housing begins to recover. Credit spreads widen as defaults increase in a service oriented, competitive economy that is brutal to manufacturing companies.

7. The price of gold goes to $800 and silver approaches $18. The dollar is stable against the euro because of renewed economic growth in the U.S. and higher interest rates.

8. Economic conditions in Japan continue to improve. After being one of the worst equity markets in a developed country during 2006, the Nikkei 225 rises 15%. In this market large capitalization stocks do outperform their smaller brethren.

9. The emerging markets of Asia take a rest. Attention shifts heavily to Latin America and Brazil stands out. It is a country with vast natural resources and reasonable labor costs. The country moves closer to an investment grade rating and the Bovespa rises to 55,000.

10. Neither of the current frontrunners for the 2008 presidential election in the U.S. proves to have staying power. Rudy Giuliani pulls ahead for the Republicans as fears of terrorism heat up again and Barack Obama gains momentum as he demonstrates that inexperience isn’t a terminal liability.

What's with the Adjusted Monetary Base?

Dennis Gartman is prone to getting carried away from time to time, but it is usually for a good reason. Today Gartman is bugged by what the Fed is doing with the Adjusted Monetary Base. Specifically he thinks the Fed is ridiculous to let the BASE fall in light of the credit crunch and the profound need for liquidity in the marketplace. Enough from me, here's Dennis:

The Fed needs to be very public in either explaining why the adjusted base is falling and what it intends to do to change that, or it will be the seen as provoking the most serious economic collapse of the past several decades. Perhaps the base is falling for some arcane, non-economic reason that we and other classical Monetarists are not cognisant of. If so, and if the Fed knows why this is so, then the authorities need to explain it to us and to the market in very clear terms... and quickly. We do not say that lightly, and we do indeed understand the seriousness of our comments here. What is happening to the adjusted monetary base is indefensible... and it is dangerous.
Dennis probably has a very good point, but didn't his tone remind you of Jim Cramer's infamous rant on CNBC about the Fed last year? Personally, I'm leaning toward the belief that something weird is going on with the numbers, but I'm also a little bit surprised that no one else has mentioned this yet. One caveat on the graph is that the data is only current through December 19th. It may very well be that the Fed has already corrected this problem.

Disclaimer

The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) who may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.